New
Superhero Flick Not for the Uninitiated
By Bruce Collier
March 5, 2009 Issue
Zack Snyder's Watchmen
is based on a series of graphic novels—12 in all—by
Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons. I have not read any of them, and
that's usually not a problem with film adaptations. I enjoyed
Peter Jackson's Lord of the Rings trilogy, and I still haven't
read a word of the novels. People I have spoken with who have
read the Watchmen books have made the same comment: "The
books make it more clear."
Sorry, Zack and the
four guys I saw on screenplay credits, you have to make it clear
for everyone. Watchmen is close to three hours in length. The
acting is more than competent, and it's full of gooey eye-candy
special effects, but it's as pretentiously muddled as a French
constitution. The story defies encapsulation, but it's essentially
the tragic saga of a group of costumed heroes—Silk Spectre,
The Comedian, Nite-Owl, Rorschach, Ozymandias and Dr. Manhattan—and
their progress from the 1940s to an alternate-history 1985 America.
In this world, Richard Nixon has stayed in office for four terms,
and has outlawed "masks" (costumed crimefighters) in
response to a public outcry against vigilantism. Some are dead,
some are retired, some have passed the cape to apprentices, and
some are still out there catching crooks and dodging cops.
And committing enough
mayhem for a Saw retrospective. Watchmen is rated R, not so much
the language (fairly tame) or the nudity (spare and generally
tasteful), but for an onslaught of sawed-off limbs, cleaved skulls,
scalded flesh and gallons of spurting blood. The story—a
melange of Cold War paranoid politics, Orwellian corporate tyranny
and doomsday tech—takes so long getting on course that I
did not care how it ended, as long as it did end. Curiously, I'm
told the graphic novels aren't nearly as, well, graphic.
Mine may be a minority
opinion, and maybe no one but fans should see movies like Watchmen.
Still, if you can't enjoy a film without studying for it beforehand,
someone failed.
DVD
OF THE FORTNIGHT
Mike Leigh may be the closest thing to an auteur in modern cinema.
His largely improvised character studies are immediately recognizable,
despite the ever-changing repertory companies and locales. His
latest, Happy Go-Lucky, benefits from Sally Hawkins’ remarkable
performance as carefree primary schoolteacher Poppy. At 30, Poppy
isn’t about to start growing up, and if she had a theme
song, it would be Kris Kristofferson’s “Don’t
Let the Bastards Get You Down.”
The movie is populated with perfectly realized characters, from
the apathetic bookshop clerk Poppy meets in the opening sequence
to the self-loathing driving instructor whose teaching methods
include quasi-Satanic symbolism and racist tirades. Best of all
is the man-hating flamenco dance instructor—you’d
swear that Leigh had been studying the classic comedies of Preston
Sturges.
There’s no conventional
plot here, but each successive episode reveals new dimensions
about Poppy and her friends, family and co-workers. Hawkins is
so completely engaging that when one of the supporting players
finally does get to her, it’s enough to break even the most
callous viewer’s heart.
- Christopher Manson
More
movie reviews