Home

Regular Features


Restaurant Guide
Dining Reviews
Musician Profiles
Business Profiles
Internet Gems

Book Reviews
Places to Go, Things to Do

Services

Where to find The Beachcomber
Send a letter to the editor

Advertise with us
Contact Us


 

Everything Old is New Again in ‘Trek

By Bruce Collier
May 14, 2009 Issue

William Shatner is negotiating cheap hotel rates. James Doohan and DeForest Kelly have passed on. George Takei is gaily married in California, and Patrick Stewart just doesn’t seem to want to play spaceman anymore. What’s a Trekker to do? Answer: see J.J. Abrams’ Star Trek, and watch your old iconic favorites in the making. It’s the ultimate genius move for a moribund franchise—stop creaking forward, and go back to the youthful “origins.” Fortunately, this is a film even the casual Trek fan (that would be me) can enjoy.

In case you’ve missed the trailers, this is the story of how a group of disparate youngsters—Kirk, Spock, Uhura, “Bones” McCoy, Sulu, Scotty and Chekhov—all arrived on the bridge of the redoubtable Federation starship Enterprise. There’s a story involving black holes, time travel, alternate destinies, and a vengeance-crazed Romulan terrorist (played by a near-unrecognizable Eric Bana), but that’s just a framework. This is about laying the foundations.

It’s good, sequel-breeding stuff. The actors—Chris Pine as Kirk, Zachary Quinto as Spock, and Karl Urban as McCoy—do a great job giving just the slightest whiff of “impressions” while respecting their characters. My only real complaint would be the relentless, crash-bang-boom pace. What always made Star Trek superior to the can-we-top-this special effects extravaganzas of Star Wars was creator Gene Roddenberry’s emphasis on human relationships. The film is about those relationships, but it could have taken more quiet time to accomplish the mission.

I saw Star Trek the day after it opened and was surprised there wasn’t a bigger crowd, until I realized that young people probably know next to nothing about the 1960s TV series that inspired this film. I sat in front of a woman near my age who laughed with self-satisfied delight at every bit of trivia and in-joke (there are plenty), explaining it to the kid with her. I think the kid got more out of the Transformers preview trailer. At least he was quieter.


WE’RE JUST NOT THAT INTO HIM


With the exception of his portrayal of the preacher in Contact, Mathew McConaughey usually plays a lovable rogue in his movies. McConaughey’s characters are often reminiscent of those immature boys who went to your high school. You know the ones. They reduced all the girls to one thing—potential conquests. But the combination of McConaughey’s charm—and his tendency to keep his shirt off through most of his movies—tends to make females in the audience tolerate these shallow characters.

However, when Jon Lucas and Scott Moore (Mean Girls, Freaky Friday) wrote the screenplay for Ghosts of Girlfriends Past, they failed to include the “lovable” in this stereotypical womanizing character…and he never even bares that famous upper torso! McConaughey’s character, Connor Mead, is a NYC photographer whose main goal in life seems to be to get every woman he meets into bed as quickly as possible. And he’s quite efficient at dumping his conquests ASAP. At one point, he uses a four-way video conference call to rid himself of three at once. The word sleazy seems insufficient.

The plot revolves around the wedding of Connor’s younger brother Paul (Breckin Meyer). Connor returns for the wedding, spending most of his time trying to talk Paul out of getting married. Complicating matters is the delightful Jennifer Garner as Jenny, Connor’s childhood friend/maid of honor and the only female in his life who hasn’t joined his nonexclusive club.

After Connor turns the couple’s rehearsal dinner into a disaster, it looks as though the wedding will not take place. But that night three ghosts visit Connor (Charles Dickens, anyone?), forcing him to review his life and probable future if he continues his life of meaningless, casual sex. His dearly departed horndog mentor Uncle Wayne (played with effective smarminess by Michael Douglas) appears at the beginning of this journey, encouraging Connor to learn from his own mistakes. Connor’s ultimate if unbelievable transformation and subsequent reunion with Jenny is way too predictable to be interesting or satisfying.

Director Mark Waters seems to have phoned this one in. As a romantic comedy, Ghosts of Girlfriends Past has a little of both, just not enough of either. - Lisa Worsham

AND THE HEALING HAS BEGUN

In X-Men Origins: Wolverine, Hugh Jackman reprises his role as the metal-clawed mutant, this time with a stroll down memory lane to peek at the events that changed Logan into the Wolverine. The film marks the fourth in the franchise for Wolverine and also stars Liev Schreiber as Wolverine's sadistic brother Victor, Ryan Reynolds as fanboy favorite Deadpool, and Danny Huston as William Stryker, the military man responsible for giving Wolverine his claws.

The film opens with a montage that depicts the scope of Wolverine's long life (lengthened by his mutant healing factor) by showing scenes from every American war, and Logan being shot in each of them. Eventually Logan and Victor end up in the Weapon X program developed by the military to make use of mutants in wartime situations. The work done by Weapon X is far from humane, and Logan soon goes AWOL to seek a life as a Canadian lumberjack. When the appearance of Victor takes someone out of his new life, Logan swears revenge and allows Stryker to bond metal to his skeleton making him a perfect killing machine.

Wolverine has brief moments of brilliance.Unfortunately, these moments are completely eclipsed by a storyline that is muddled and dialogue that would be too cheesy for comic books. Jackman and Schreiber deserve credit for doing so much with so little—both actors deliver shining performances with characters who have been written to do little more than glower and brood. The rivalry between Wolverine and Sabretooth (as Victor comes to be known) is by far the most complex and engaging in the film, completely dwarfing the painfully cliched love story. There are enough claws, crashes, and kabooms to justify the ticket price, but audiences looking for character development or plot progression might end up wishing their wallets had a healing factor. - Adam Pope

More movie reviews

 

 

Copyright © The Beachcomber, Inc. 2003 - 2010. All rights reserved.